|

Sections in 1996–97

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 Thee EE Section changed the paper review process to increase the quality of reviews. Proposals must have theoretical base, research foundation, and clear application.

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 The EM Section developed a Distinguished Dissertation Award in honor of John McAdoo, for 1997 presentation.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 The FH Section’s goal was to increase interdisciplinary participation in the section, including medicine and family health physicians.

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0 The FP Section continued conducting public policy skills pre-conference workshops, looking at how to translate information for the media. Section members also looked at setting up an internship fund for someone in Washington, DC.

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 The FS Section worked on ethical policies for family scientists.

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 The FT Section worked at building better ties with the American Association of Marriage and Family Therapists as a collaborator with NCFR.

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 The FF Section started a mentoring program and worked on a listserv for the section.

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 0 The IN Section recommended investigating the renaming of NCFR to expand its reach.

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 The RF Section worked on a volume, “Religion and the Family,” with royalties to go to the Section.

11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 0 The RT Section expanded the Burgess Award Committee to seven reviewers and working on an Anselm Strauss Award for qualitative family research.

Tags:
Categories: Sections
People: